Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights whilst respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided through the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking while in the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the legislation laid down with the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority with the parent department on the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount in the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

four.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of someday inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness in the alleged prevalence and also the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred to generally be the real brothers from the deceased but they did not respond in the slightest degree on the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many instances that extra judicial confession of an accused is often a weak style of evidence which can be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is likewise relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding presence of some light on the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners jointly on a motorcycle at 4.

Note: Please fill any discipline and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave industry blank.

It's now properly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different, therefore, inside our view the figured out Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner from the same Additional Sessions Judge.”

Please use a single username and password set from the options. If it does not work please try the other. Each individual allows single consumer access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have completed your session in Manupatra.

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any opportunity adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to generally be designed.

In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm into a person causes death of these types of person, both by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is alleged to commit qatl-i-khata.”

This system, to be used by members in the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.

This case has become cited in many subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, as well as the rule of legislation.

The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report more info into the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

10. Without touching the merits of the case of the issue of once-a-year increases while in the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, this kind of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to become made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) in the Pakistan Constitution delivers authentic jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and probable hazard to local residents. Eventually, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have adverse effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out while in the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Enhancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used for a reason to prevent environmental degradation.